Taxation logo taxation mission text

Since 1927 the leading authority on tax law, practice and administration

A little learning

31 August 2010 / Mike Truman
Issue: 4270 / Categories: Comment & Analysis , Employees , Income Tax
The case of Goldberg demonstrates why proper representation is so important, says MIKE TRUMAN

KEY POINTS

  • Contractual PILON is taxable as general earnings ITEPA 2003 s 62.
  • Non-contractual PILON should get £30 000 exemption ITEPA 2003 s 403.
  • Leading cases of EMI Group Electronics Ltd and SCA Packaging.
  • Goldberg decided without reference to contractual entitlement – seems questionable.

I really hope I am wrong about this case (TC628). I don’t have a lot of sympathy for Mr Goldberg who the First-tier Tribunal said ‘muddied the waters’ in his evidence about the date a letter setting out his terms of employment was sent and the terms on which he left that employment.

It is also rather foolish to argue a case in person about a tax repayment where some £12 000 of tax...

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxation.co.uk, please click the login box below:

If you are not a subscriber but are a registered user or have a free trial, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this item in full.
back to top icon