Taxation logo taxation mission text

Since 1927 the leading authority on tax law, practice and administration

Crucial connection

11 March 2014
Issue: 4443 / Categories: Tax cases , MTIC fraud , VAT

Edgeskill Ltd v CRC, Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber)

HMRC refused the taxpayer company’s claim for input tax in respect of 93 transactions involving the purchase and export of mobile telephones. The department said the deals were connected with missing trader intra-community fraud about which the taxpayer should have known or had known.

The First-tier Tribunal agreed with the Revenue and the taxpayer appealed.

The Upper Tribunal said the taxpayer had “not come close to discharging the heavy burden of displacing findings of fact” made by the first tribunal – which had had not misapplied the test in Axel Kittel v Belgium and Belgium v Recolta Recycling SPRL (C-439/04 and C-20 440/04).

The judge said it was settled law that the objective criteria that determine the scope of VAT and the right to deduct are not only met when it is shown that the taxable person intends to evade tax but also when that person knew or should...

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxation.co.uk, please click the login box below:

If you are not a subscriber but are a registered user or have a free trial, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this item in full.
back to top icon