Taxation logo taxation mission text

Since 1927 the leading authority on tax law, practice and administration

On the back foot

10 May 2016 / Paul Noble
Issue: 4549 / Categories: Comment & Analysis

The implications of the First-tier Tribunal’s decision in Gold Nuts.

KEY POINTS

  • HMRC can pursue a criminal or civil line of enquiry when investigating tax fraud.
  • A disclosure under the contractual disclosure facility is an admission of fraud.
  • The First-tier Tribunal decided it did not have the jurisdiction to close a COP9 enquiry.
  • The right to refuse to respond to a Sch 36 notice.
  • Potentially incriminating evidence must be disclosed at an early stage of an enquiry.

When HMRC suspects fraud or uses its extensive information-gathering powers practitioners and their clients may feel overwhelmed and alarmed. The department’s powers in these areas are often taken for granted and the receipt of a letter explaining that HMRC is investigating under code of practice 9 (COP9) or issuing information notices can put the recipient at a distinct disadvantage and on...

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxation.co.uk, please click the login box below:

If you are not a subscriber but are a registered user or have a free trial, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this item in full.
back to top icon