Taxation logo taxation mission text

Since 1927 the leading authority on tax law, practice and administration

Be careful what you wish for

24 January 2012 / David Kirk
Issue: 4338 / Categories: Comment & Analysis , Arctic , GAAR , Income Tax

Do we want a general anti-avoidance rule? DAVID KIRK thinks not

KEY POINTS

  • A suitable quid pro quo for the GAAR?
  • Importance of a clearance system.
  • What is reasonable tax planning?
  • Effect of a GAAR on income shifting – Arctic Systems.
  • Corresponding non-abusive arrangements.

We are all in favour of a general anti-avoidance rule (GAAR) are we not? At least we are in public: it is very difficult at a time of financial stringency to be defending tax avoidance.

Any criticism of steps taken to counter it particularly from tax consultants can easily be seen as special pleading.

It is against this background that comment on the report by Graham Aaronson QC has been somewhat muted and there is a danger that the GAAR could slip in without proper scrutiny.

This would be a pity ...

Only subscribers may read the full article

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this item in full.
FIVE WAYS TO MAKE ACCOUNTS PRODUCTION AND TAX EASIER.
Download the exclusive Xero
free report here.

New queries
Please email any questions you might have
to: taxation@lexisnexis.co.uk.

back to top icon