Taxation logo taxation mission text

Since 1927 the leading authority on tax law, practice and administration

Acceptable arrangements

27 July 2015
Issue: 4511 / Categories: Tax cases , VAT

Newey (trading as Ocean Finance) v CRC, Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber)
 

N trading as Ocean Finance provided services as a licensed credit broker in the UK. It was not registered for VAT because it made exempt supplies only and as a result incurred irrecoverable VAT on advertising and other supplies.

So that the business could obtain advertising services VAT-free N set up a company (Alabaster) in Jersey. He transferred the loan broking business to Alabaster which outsourced the processing operations back to the UK. It then engaged an advertising agency in Jersey.

The purported effect of the move was that the loan brokerage services supplied by Ocean Finance were made in the UK – where the recipients belonged – and therefore remained exempt.

The advertising services were treated as not subject to UK VAT because the supplier of the services and Alabaster belonged in Jersey.

HMRC said N supplied the loan broking services and received...

Only subscribers may read the full article

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this item in full.
back to top icon