Non-dom rules could 'kill golden goose'

Posted: 07 January 2008
Issue: Online only
Categories: Update, News, Residence & Domicile

Related articles:

'Important core of people' wil be hardest hit by changes, warns finance veteran

Proposed new rules concerning non-domiciled residents 'could kill the golden goose', Lord Balfour has warned.

In a letter to the Financial Times, the finance veteran said that drafting the mooted changes 'is proving hard'.

He added that the 'tax-producers' who will be 'hardest hit' by the proposed flat rate taxes or by the submission of their non-UK assets to British taxation will not be the so-called super-rich.

The most affected, he claimed, will be the 'important core of people… already contributing very substantially to the Treasury via pay-as-you-earn and National Insurance.

Lord Balfour went on to question whether 'a policy of imposing a greater tax burden on foreign employees in the UK than on wealthy tax migrants [is] really what either Labour or the Conservatives want'.

He suggested that for wealthy migrants in the UK to contribute more by way of tax, the Government could introduce a class of person to be known as 'UK tax-resident but not domiciled'.

This, he said, might work by making liable to income tax all remittances of funds to the UK by and for non-domiciles. However, 'a flow-through would be allowed from trusts and companies of treaty or other credits for income or gains taxes already paid on those funds at source'.



Share this page



Follow Taxation on Twitter Follow Taxation on Facebook
What to do with IR35?: