Taxation logo taxation mission text

Since 1927 the leading authority on tax law, practice and administration

Effect of the Locke and Haworth decisions on follower notices and accelerated payment notices

09 August 2021 / Hartley Foster , George Gillham
Issue: 4804 / Categories: Comment & Analysis
54665
When are follower notices unlawful?

The follower notice (FN) and accelerated payment notice (APN) regimes were introduced by Finance Act 2014. The government indicated that the regimes were being introduced with the aim of changing the economics of litigating tax avoidance cases.

Broadly the APN regime enables HMRC to require that in direct tax avoidance cases the taxpayer pays the disputed tax in advance of any appeal to the First-tier Tribunal. The regime as a whole was considered in R (on the application of Rowe) v HMRC [2018] STC 462 (and a number of other similar challenges). The courts held that the APN regime achieves a simple rebalancing: in such cases it will be HMRC rather than the taxpayer who holds the tax pending resolution of the substantive dispute before the tribunal.

The FN regime goes much further. It enables HMRC to issue an FN warning...

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxation.co.uk, please click the login box below:

If you are not a subscriber but are a registered user or have a free trial, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this item in full.

Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.

back to top icon