Taxation logo taxation mission text

Since 1927 the leading authority on tax law, practice and administration

Unnecessary convolution

01 September 2005 / John Jeffrey-cook
Issue: 4023 / Categories: Comment & Analysis , Income Tax

JOHN JEFFREY-COOK makes a plea for simplification.

IN HIS RECENT article 'Charity begins at home' (Taxation 28 July 2005, page 449) Malcolm Gunn discussed the impact of the income tax charge on pre-owned assets. He pointed out some of the extraordinary anomalies in the régime.

JOHN JEFFREY-COOK makes a plea for simplification.

IN HIS RECENT article 'Charity begins at home' (Taxation 28 July 2005 page 449) Malcolm Gunn discussed the impact of the income tax charge on pre-owned assets. He pointed out some of the extraordinary anomalies in the régime.
In addition the drafting of the legislation is unnecessarily convoluted. Let us take what should be a simple provision the rate of charge. FA 2004 Sch 15 paras 7(2) and 9(1) provide that for chattels and intangible property N is the amount of interest that would be payable … if interest were payable at the prescribed rate … . Paragraph 1 provides that 'prescribed' means prescribed by regulations.
We then find that in the Charge to Income Tax by Reference to Enjoyment of Property Previously Owned Regulations 2005 SI 2005/724 reg 3(1) says...

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxation.co.uk, please click the login box below:

If you are not a subscriber but are a registered user or have a free trial, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this item in full.

Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.

back to top icon