Taxation logo taxation mission text

Since 1927 the leading authority on tax law, practice and administration

Income shifting consultation: Q7

07 February 2008
Categories: Arctic Systems , Jones v. Garnett , Income Tax
If you disagree with the fundamental approach taken to income shifting taken by the Government, what do you believe their reaction should have been to the decision in the Arctic Systems case?

This question is not part of the consultation paper which presumes that income 'shifting' has to be stopped however we feel that the Treasury ought to see what tax practitioners think about the line they have taken!

There is an EDM before Parliament which points out (amongst other things) the discontinuity between the way that married couples and civil partners are dealt with on divorce and the way that they are treated when they try to split income between them.

Others have commented that the issue of income splitting should be dealt with in the context of small business taxation as a whole not just as a stand-alone issue. Finally some would say that splitting income like this is an inevitable outcome of independent taxation and even that it was forseen when it was introduced.

Please provide your comments in the Discussion section below....

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxation.co.uk, please click the login box below:

If you are not a subscriber but are a registered user or have a free trial, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this item in full.

Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.

back to top icon