Taxation logo taxation mission text

Since 1927 the leading authority on tax law, practice and administration

Hairdressers' supplies

24 November 2008
Categories: Tax cases
Holland (trading as The Studio Hair Company) v CRC; Vigdor Ltd v CRC, Chancery Division, 30 October 2008

The taxpayers owned two separate hairdressing salons. Self-employed hairdressers worked from the salons using the various facilities provided in return for certain payments.

The VAT tribunal held in both cases that the supplies by the taxpayers to the hairdressers did not include the 'leasing or letting of immovable property' within the exception in VATA 1994 Sch 9 Part 2 group 1 item 1. Further if the supplies did fall within the exception they should be characterised as single supplies of hairdressers' facilities and should be standard rated.

The taxpayers appealed.

The High Court judge ruled that the exemption did not apply to a licence to occupy land which was only one element of a package of supplies. He said that the various facilities provided to the hairdressers were a single indivisible economic supply which it would be artificial to split. The facilities were closely interdependent...

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxation.co.uk, please click the login box below:

If you are not a subscriber but are a registered user or have a free trial, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this item in full.

Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.

back to top icon