.png)
.png)
MARK MORTON reviews a decision about incidental expenditure on the installation of plant and machinery
KEY POINTS
- The eligibility of incidental expenditure under CAA 2001 s 25.
- The progress of the three tribunal hearings.
- Has plant become part of the premises?
- Does CAA 2001 s 66 apply to expenditure on incidental alterations or on making the plant more usable?
- Apportioning the cost of preliminary expenditure.
The question of whether an item qualifies as plant or machinery and thus becomes eligible for capital allowances – rather than simply being a capital expense to be taken into account in a future capital gains tax computation – can be complicated but things can become even more convoluted when considering costs that are incidental to the expenditure on the installation of the plant or machinery.
In a case before the Special Commissioner in 2007 (JD Wetherspoon plc...
Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this item in full.
Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.
