Taxation logo taxation mission text

Since 1927 the leading authority on tax law, practice and administration

Standing Committee Debates

06 June 2001 / Allison Plager
Issue: 3810 / Categories: Comment & Analysis
ALLISON PLAGER reports on the fifth, sixth and seventh sittings of Standing Committee A

AFTER A BRIEF discussion on the possibilities of permitting the use of laptop computers in committee (not yet allowed) the committee turned to Schedule 24 which relates to relief for creative artists' fluctuating profits.

Oliver Letwin welcomed the Schedule saying that it offered the 'clearest possible exposition of averaging'. However he raised three questions. Firstly with regard to the taper for variations in annual profits of between 70 and 75 per cent he suggested that it would be simpler to have a cut-off level of either 70 or 75 per cent. Secondly he noted that the Schedule related exclusively to artists but suggested that it would be helpful to farmers and their advisers if the new text could apply to them as the existing legislation for farmers' averaging was 'not applied to their income in a way that an ordinary human...

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxation.co.uk, please click the login box below:

If you are not a subscriber but are a registered user or have a free trial, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this item in full.

Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.

back to top icon