Taxation logo taxation mission text

Since 1927 the leading authority on tax law, practice and administration

Intention when determining employment status

12 December 2018 / Alexander Wilson
Issue: 4676 / Categories: Comment & Analysis
istock-617737018_fmt

On the border

KEY POINTS

  • A hypothetical contract can only be determined by establishing what the parties would have agreed.
  • The approach of the tribunals is mixed but the main theme seems to be that the parties’ intentions are of little importance.
  • IR35 requires an artificial exercise by the tribunal to determine the hypothetical contract between the worker and the client.
  • The Ready Mixed Concrete case explains that the rights and duties of the parties and their intentions are relevant.
  • The Supreme Court in Pimlico Plumbers confirmed that the overarching intention of the parties is material when determining employment status.
  • If an arrangement is genuine a business should be able to choose between taking on employees or outsourcing.

On a true reading of ITEPA 2003 ch 8...

Only subscribers may read the full article

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this item in full.
back to top icon