Taxation logo taxation mission text

Since 1927 the leading authority on tax law, practice and administration

New queries: 21 November 2019

18 November 2019
Issue: 4721 / Categories: Forum & Feedback
On the move; Loan to participators; E-book sales; Dividing property deeds

On the move 

Deductibility of business items in domestic move.

My client and his wife both work from home. He is a music composer and she runs a puppet theatre. 

They have justifiably (in my opinion) deducted various elements of household expenses over the years. Now they are moving and have asked whether any of the removal expenses are deductible. 

It is clear that the removal firm will be shifting considerable quantities of business assets, particularly in respect of the puppet theatre, but also musical instruments and computers. It seems likely that the job will cost more because of these items – in the client’s estimation, it will represent 50% of what is being moved. My questions are therefore as follows.

  • Would it be possible to claim some of the cost as a business expense? 
  • Would it make any difference if the movers itemised the costs on their bill, or provided separate bills? 
  • Are the costs incurred on the basis of a personal choice (to live in a different house) and are therefore not deductible?

I look forward to receiving replies.

Query 19,471– Van Man.

 

Loan to participators 

Loans to participators and family members.

Jake is the sole shareholder of TradeCo, a UK trading company. He and Rebecca are the only directors and they, with seven other individuals, are full-time employees of the company.

In its financial year to 31 December 2018, the company has advanced a loan of £70,000 to Jake, which remained outstanding as at 1 October 2019. This balance is understood to be subject to corporation tax at 32.5% under CTA 2010, s 455. A single, extra loan of £8,000 was made in 2018 to Rebecca, which also remains outstanding as at 1 October 2019.
If my understanding is correct, if Rebecca – who owns no shares in the company – was completely unrelated to Jake, it seems that the ‘loan to participators’ provisions would not apply at all – although benefits in kind should be considered.

However, Rebecca is Jake’s mother.

In considering whether the exemption from the said charge, provided by CTA 2010, s 456(3), is available – condition A (loan below £15,000) appears to be satisfied, and so do condition B (full-time worker) and condition C (no material interest).

My understanding is that, in this case, Rebecca comes within s 455 because a loan was made to an associate of a participator (the definition in CTA 2010, s 448(2)(b) includes parents) but is then eligible for exemption under s 456(3).

Do readers agree with my analysis?

Query 19,472– Participator.

 

E-book sales 

VAT and MOSS considerations on electronic book sales.

I act for a corporate client which is a VAT-registered publisher. Historically, the company has only sold hard copy books, so has never had to account for output tax. The company recently issued Kindle versions of several publications, and has received the first payment from Amazon in respect of sales.

It is difficult to find any guidance from Amazon on how to treat these payments for VAT. Presumably they are liable to output tax because they relate to electronic services. 

Does the publisher have to worry about the mini one-stop shop (MOSS)? And where does an Amazon seller go to find answers to these questions?

Query 19,473– Burned.

 

Dividing property deeds 

Tax on transactions necessary to secure equity release funds.

My client’s residence also has two rental properties on the same site. These were converted to residential property from outbuildings many years ago and are accessed by way of a driveway and are, in effect, landlocked.

Ten years ago, my client took an equity release on his residence. To secure funding, a separate registration of the title deeds on his residence was made with the Land Registry. The other two properties and the land immediately around them were transferred to a separate title deed.

My client would now like to release equity through a buy-to-let scheme on the two rental properties. To obtain finance, each rental property needs to have its own land registry certificate of title with all necessary legal easements. Because he cannot transfer land to himself to effect the title split at the Land Registry, the decision was made to transfer each rental property to himself and his sister as joint legal owners and tenants in common. A declaration of trust would then be registered that the sister has no beneficial or equitable interest in the properties and holds them as a bare trustee solely for my client’s benefit.

The lending institution will not consider the rental properties as part of a trust or company, but will accept them owned jointly with a family member as suggested.

Assuming the client dies first, his sister, who is an executor but not beneficiary, will sell the properties and the net sale proceeds will be included in his estate. Because the equity release loan will continue until the death of the survivor, his sister would be a continuing party to mortgages over properties she has no equitable interest in and is holding as a bare trustee for my client’s benefit. If the sister dies before the client, he would retain the equity release as the surviving owner.

I am considering all tax issues for both parties concerned, now and in the future, and would appreciate any thoughts and guidance.

I hope Taxation readers can help.

Query 19,474– Futureproof.
 
Issue: 4721 / Categories: Forum & Feedback
back to top icon