Taxation logo taxation mission text

Since 1927 the leading authority on tax law, practice and administration
Home Saved articles Viewed items Login Contact Free Trial Advertise View virtual issue View online issue

Product was similar to a potato crisp

02 June 2025
Issue: 4987 / Categories: Tax cases
Walkers Snack Foods Ltd v CRC, Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber), 22 May 2025

The taxpayer produced Sensations Poppadoms. It claimed these should be zero rated because the key ingredient was gram flour. HMRC said they were standard rated as a product similar to potato crisps – they could be consumed without any further preparation. On the ingredients it said potato granules formed 18% with another 18% being potato starch and as such the product fell within the term ‘potato’ for the purpose of VATA 1994 Sch 8 Group 1 excepted item 5 – which lists the exceptions to the zero-rating legislation for food and drink.

The First-tier Tribunal dismissed the taxpayer’s appeal.

On the taxpayer’s assertion that the First-tier Tribunal had erred in its finding that the term ‘potato’ includes ‘potato granules’ the Upper Tribunal found that it was ‘more than entitled to do so’. The judges could see no basis on which the First-tier Tribunal’s decision could...

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxation.co.uk, please click the login box below:

If you are not a subscriber but are a registered user or have a free trial, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this item in full.

Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.

back to top icon