Since 1927 the leading authority on tax law, practice and administration

Issue: Vol 168, Issue 4329

Issue: Vol 168, Issue 4329

7 Nov 2011

View other Issues

IN THIS ISSUE

Go to page of 2

CAP1 introduced

Hansard, 17 October 2011, vol 533, no 207, col 701W

A J Clarke (TC1461)

V Karnani (TC1469)

R (on the application of Golding) v General Commissioners of Income Tax, Queen’s Bench Division

R Orme (TC1460)

CRC v Marks & Spencer, Court of Appeal

A, D and J Forster (TC1319)

By Julie Butler; £95

Show

15

Results

back pagination icon

Go to page of 2

READERS' FORUM premium icon

Readers’ forum: Purchase invoice and partial exemption calculations Readers’ forum: Tax considerations when transferring valuable metals Readers’ forum: Does robbing Peter to pay Paul have unintended consequence? Readers’ forum: Goodwill good? New queries: 7 May 2026

TAX JUST GOT COMPLICATED. HERE’S HOW TO MAKE IT SIMPLE.
Download the exclusive Xero
free report here.

New queries

Please email any questions you might have
to: taxation@lexisnexis.co.uk.

NEWS

Unintended tax consequence of Renters’ Rights Act avoided No appeal in Colchester Institute Corporation case New dedicated helpline for trusts queries Last-minute pension saving could prove costly Taxes on UK workers rise at fastest rate in OECD

Third slide

Deadline dates for June 2026

CASES

No level of direction needed for host employer liability Second-hand margin scheme record-keeping failure Failure to pay contributions was breach of statutory duty Expenses knowingly overclaimed Impossible for voluntary returns to be late

MOST POPULAR

HMRC’s money laundering penalties This week's opinion: 7 May 2026 Unintended tax consequence of Renters’ Rights Act avoided No appeal in Colchester Institute Corporation case New dedicated helpline for trusts queries

back to top icon