Since 1927 the leading authority on tax law, practice and administration

Issue: Vol 168, Issue 4333

Issue: Vol 168, Issue 4333

1 Dec 2011

View other Issues

IN THIS ISSUE

Go to page of 2

Exempt bodies to more easily share back-office services

Employers will not gain excessive tax relief through pension schemes

Candlestick Company (TC1573)

CRC v Rank Group plc (C-259/10 and C-260/10), European Court of Justice

CRC v Cozens and others, Chancery Division

Cardiff Lift Company (TC1470)

Grattan plc v CRC, Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber)

Innocent Ltd (No 2) (TC1450)

Show

15

Results

back pagination icon

Go to page of 2

Newsletter sign-up Subscribe

READERS' FORUM premium icon

New Queries: 10 October 2024 Readers’ forum: Residential property developer tax trap Readers’ forum: Will losses prevent relief claim? Readers’ forum: Best tax result for room rental Readers’ forum: Is hairdresser using the wrong category?

FIVE WAYS TO MAKE ACCOUNTS PRODUCTION AND TAX EASIER.
Download the exclusive Xero
free report here.

New queries

Please email any questions you might have
to: taxation@lexisnexis.co.uk.

NEWS

In brief: 10 October 2024 Making tax digital will not benefit clients, survey finds Outdated mileage rates need to be updated, says ATT Rates relief to be withdrawn from private schools in Wales Direct payment scheme extended

Third slide

Deadline dates for November 2024

CASES

Waiver of right to enforce debt Definition of a year for full protection 2012 Connection between investment and payment Reliance on tax adviser was not an excuse Tax liability declaration was an abuse of process

MOST POPULAR

Q&A: Contract law position in VAT planning New Queries: 10 October 2024 In brief: 10 October 2024 Making tax digital will not benefit clients, survey finds Readers’ forum: Residential property developer tax trap

back to top icon