Since 1927 the leading authority on tax law, practice and administration

Issue: Vol 169, Issue 4358

Issue: Vol 169, Issue 4358

18 Jun 2012

View other Issues

IN THIS ISSUE

Go to page of 2

Is proposed rule too widely drawn?

Benson Partnership Ltd (TC1760)

The Copperfields Restaurant (TC1974)

Forde and McHugh Ltd v CRC, Court of Appeal

Helena Partnerships Ltd v CRC, Court of Appeal

Howes (TC1874)

Prince and others (TC1852)

Show

15

Results

back pagination icon

Go to page of 2

Newsletter sign-up Subscribe

READERS' FORUM premium icon

Tax tip: NICs Readers’ forum: Concern about structure of proposed new scheme Readers’ forum: Too late to appeal assessments which may be invalid? Readers’ forum: Conundrum when advising both parties who are divorcing Readers’ forum: Does death of joint property owner cause a VAT problem?

FIVE WAYS TO MAKE ACCOUNTS PRODUCTION AND TAX EASIER.
Download the exclusive Xero
free report here.

New queries

Please email any questions you might have
to: taxation@lexisnexis.co.uk.

NEWS

In brief: 16 May 2024 PAYE receipts surge in 2023-24 Crypto investors must keep accurate records Tax policy can help deliver net zero emissions Voluntary office-holders' expenses

Third slide

Deadline dates for June 2024

CASES

Suppressed sales resulted in a personal liability notice Information request was not proportionate Agreement did not constitute grant of an option No evidence to support claim for R&D costs Fields provide an amenity to the farmhouse

MOST POPULAR

Suppressed sales resulted in a personal liability notice This week's opinion: 16 May 2024 Upper Tribunal in RALC Consulting Ltd Upper Tribunal decision on HMRC’s appeal in CRC v Marlborough DP Ltd Reflections on demergers

back to top icon