Since 1927 the leading authority on tax law, practice and administration

Issue: Vol 172, Issue 4420

Issue: Vol 172, Issue 4420

19 Sep 2013

View other Issues

IN THIS ISSUE

Go to page of 2

A Headley (TC2779)

Arkeley v CRC, Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber)

R (on the application of Rouse) v CRC, Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber)

Lloyds TSB Equipment Leasing (No 1) v CRC, Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber)

D La Roche (TC2758)

P Tindale (TC2749)

Tasks to carry out in the office this week

Show

15

Results

back pagination icon

Go to page of 2

Newsletter sign-up Subscribe

READERS' FORUM premium icon

Tax tip: Work from home allowance Readers’ forum: Is there an alternative to using time apportionment? Readers’ forum: Tax liability on paying out distribution to members Readers’ forum: Should taxpayers submit form VAT652? Readers’ forum: Does option to tax on land also apply to buildings?

FIVE WAYS TO MAKE ACCOUNTS PRODUCTION AND TAX EASIER.
Download the exclusive Xero
free report here.

New queries

Please email any questions you might have
to: taxation@lexisnexis.co.uk.

NEWS

In brief: 25 July 2024 Movers and shakers: 25 July 2024 Agent update 121 available New power for the Office for Budget Responsibility Pressing tax issues need prioritising, says CIOT

Third slide

Deadline dates for August 2024

CASES

Rental income disclosure was unprompted Ignorance of the law is an excuse Clear winner but costs reduced for other factors Company was not resident in the US for treaty purposes Collagen-based drink was a beauty product

MOST POPULAR

Rental income disclosure was unprompted Ignorance of the law is an excuse Clear winner but costs reduced for other factors Company was not resident in the US for treaty purposes Collagen-based drink was a beauty product

back to top icon