Since 1927 the leading authority on tax law, practice and administration

Issue: Vol 174, Issue 4462

Issue: Vol 174, Issue 4462

29 Jul 2014

View other Issues

IN THIS ISSUE

Go to page of 2

CRC v Lok’nStore Group plc, Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Division)

PG Tindale v CRC, Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Division)

P Figg (TC3703)

P Roelich (TC3704)

Isocom Ltd and GH Tahmosybayat (TC3696)

Full pass lists and award winners

Client considerations for this week

Show

15

Results

back pagination icon

Go to page of 2

Newsletter sign-up Subscribe

READERS' FORUM premium icon

Tax tip: NICs Readers’ forum: Concern about structure of proposed new scheme Readers’ forum: Too late to appeal assessments which may be invalid? Readers’ forum: Conundrum when advising both parties who are divorcing Readers’ forum: Does death of joint property owner cause a VAT problem?

FIVE WAYS TO MAKE ACCOUNTS PRODUCTION AND TAX EASIER.
Download the exclusive Xero
free report here.

New queries

Please email any questions you might have
to: taxation@lexisnexis.co.uk.

NEWS

Help test the single trade window Waiting times on HMRC helplines spiral out of control Football agents’ dual representation contracts clarified Late payment penalties toughened Call for proposals on how to simplify the UK VAT system

Third slide

Deadline dates for June 2024

CASES

Suppressed sales resulted in a personal liability notice Information request was not proportionate Agreement did not constitute grant of an option No evidence to support claim for R&D costs Fields provide an amenity to the farmhouse

MOST POPULAR

Help test the single trade window Waiting times on HMRC helplines spiral out of control Football agents’ dual representation contracts clarified Late payment penalties toughened Call for proposals on how to simplify the UK VAT system

back to top icon