Taxation logo taxation mission text

Since 1927 the leading authority on tax law, practice and administration

This week's opinion: 16 January 2020

15 January 2020 / Andrew Hubbard
Issue: 4727 / Categories: Comment & Analysis
Overly harsh consequences of pensions busting?

Another pensions busting case has come before the First-tier Tribunal, R Rowland (TC7499). 

In this one, the taxpayer was subject not only to an unauthorised payment charge and a surcharge but was also penalised for submitting an incorrect tax return. Further, he stands to lose most if not all of his pension fund because the provider has been wound up after an investigation by the insolvency service. Cases like this leave a nasty taste in the mouth. Not because of the approach of HMRC or the tribunal, which have simply followed the law, but because the result seems very harsh. Taxpayers in these situations may be naive or even greedy but they are often caught up in situations they do not understand and have their entire financial future put in jeopardy.

I am not sure what the solution is for these sorts of cases, although it is clear that there needs to be a mixture of tax and regulatory measures. There probably does need to be a degree of financial penalty for pensions busting, otherwise everybody would do it, but I think more debate is needed on the best way of dealing with the problem and, in particular, who should bear the tax when things go wrong. 

By way of contrast, Neil Warren’s article (see link above right) shows that HMRC has made good progress with personal tax accounts and I can add a footnote here. Just before Christmas I encountered some problems accessing my own account. My heart sank when I realised I would have to call the helpline, but I got through quickly and the HMRC officer helped me sort out the problem, staying on the line to make sure that I could get back into my account. This was high quality support for which HMRC should be congratulated.
Issue: 4727 / Categories: Comment & Analysis
back to top icon