Taxation logo taxation mission text

Since 1927 the leading authority on tax law, practice and administration

Employment tax: implications of the Supreme Court Mencap decision

11 May 2021 / Justine Riccomini
Issue: 4791 / Categories: Comment & Analysis
48410
Calling time on work

Key points

  • The appellants claimed that they were due national minimum wage during night shifts while sleeping or while awake but not actually working.
  • The Supreme court dismissed the appeal of both appellants.
  • The court highlighted the distinction between ‘actually working’ and ‘being available for work’ is a question of fact.
  • The need for employment taxation practitioners to understand national minimum wage legislation and its potential tax cost to a business.
  • Employers should agree sleep-in allowances in advance with employees – they do not count as pay for minimum wage purposes.

The decision in the double case of Royal Mencap Society v Tomlinson-Blake and Shannon v Rampersad was handed down on 19 March 2021 having been heard at the Supreme Court in February 2020. It was delayed in part due to the death on 1 December 2020 of the presiding judge Lord Kerr of Tonaghmore. The...

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxation.co.uk, please click the login box below:

If you are not a subscriber but are a registered user or have a free trial, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this item in full.

Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.

back to top icon