Taxation logo taxation mission text

Since 1927 the leading authority on tax law, practice and administration

News - tax cases

13 March 2006
Categories: Tax cases
Khan v CRC; Palmer v CRC; Byrom and others (trading as Salon 24) v CRC; Dollond & Aitchison Ltd v CCE; Rudi Heger GmbH v Finanzamt Graz-Stadt; Morris v CRC

Fair hearing

A taxpayer who owned a dry cleaning business was compulsorily registered for VAT. He was also assessed to a VATA 1994 s 60 penalty. He appealed. The VAT tribunal found for Customs so the taxpayer appealed. The High Court dismissed the appeal so he appealed again. He claimed among other matters that he had been incompetently represented before the tribunal and that the interview should have been conducted under Code C Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984.
The Court of Appeal said that VAT officers were not charged with the duty of investigating offences they were rather investigating whether a taxpayer's VAT affairs were in order. If the taxpayer's affairs were not compliant the officer could decide whether or not a penalty should be imposed. While the VAT regime was classified as criminal under the European Convention on Human Rights...

If you or your firm subscribes to, please click the login box below:

If you are not a subscriber but are a registered user or have a free trial, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this item in full.

Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or '' for further assistance.

back to top icon