Taxation logo taxation mission text

Since 1927 the leading authority on tax law, practice and administration

Triple jump

24 September 2013 / Sean Randall
Issue: 4421 / Categories: Comment & Analysis , Avoidance , Investments , Land & property

Responsible stamp duty land tax planning is possible in spite of three sets of legislative provisions


  • SDLT now has three types of general anti-avoidance rule.
  • Uncertainty over HMRC’s application of one rule in the context of corporate deals has mostly been resolved.
  • Uncertainty over another rule has significantly increased following a recent tribunal decision.
  • The nature of the GAAR requires those entering into land transactions to shift their point of reference.
  • Determining where the boundaries of the anti-avoidance provisions lie.

Stamp duty land tax (SDLT) anti-avoidance has been quite a dynamic area this summer. First HMRC confirmed their interpretation of an anti-avoidance provision (see FA 2003 Sch 7 para 2(4A) – the “mini-GAAR”) which restricts the availability of SDLT group relief in certain circumstances.

Second the First-tier Tribunal gave its decision in Project Blue Limited v HMRC [2013]...

If you or your firm subscribes to, please click the login box below:

If you are not a subscriber but are a registered user or have a free trial, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this item in full.

Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or '' for further assistance.

back to top icon