Taxation logo taxation mission text

Since 1927 the leading authority on tax law, practice and administration

Ironic Options

05 January 2005 / Peter Vaines
Issue: 3989 / Categories: Comment & Analysis , Capital Gains , Employees , Income Tax
PETER VAINES surveys section 144ZA arrangements

TAXATION OF CHARGEABLE Gains Act 1992 section 144ZA was introduced by the FA 2003 to counteract the problems which had arisen as a result of Mansworth v Jelley [2003] STC 53. There is a delightful degree of irony here which deserves some explanation.

Mansworth v Jelley was all about the value at which option shares were acquired for capital gains tax purposes. Was it the amount actually paid for the shares under the option or was it the market value of the shares at the time the option was exercised? The Court of Appeal decided that the acquisition value was the market value of the shares at the time the option was exercised.

The twist

However there was a twist. It was not simply a matter of replacing the amount paid for the option by the market value; the amount on which income tax is charged on the...

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxation.co.uk, please click the login box below:

If you are not a subscriber but are a registered user or have a free trial, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this item in full.
back to top icon