Taxation logo taxation mission text

Since 1927 the leading authority on tax law, practice and administration

This week's opinion

24 October 2017
Issue: 4621 / Categories: Comment & Analysis

Blurred lines

The publication of the draft guidance on penalties for enablers of defeated tax avoidance reminds us of how much the tax avoidance landscape has changed. I was at the Latimer House conference in 2005 when Dave Hartnett former HMRC general secretary for tax announced the department’s new approach to tackling aggressive tax avoidance – dubbed by some the ‘litigate or die’ strategy. It perhaps took longer than he had hoped (my memory was that he wanted to stamp out avoidance by 2010) but there is no doubt that speech started a process that has led to most people in the tax community viewing packaged arrangements as something toxic to be avoided at all costs. Now as well as all the other anti-avoidance measures we have new rules that allow HMRC to charge a penalty on the promoter of a failed abusive arrangement equal to the fees...

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxation.co.uk, please click the login box below:

If you are not a subscriber but are a registered user or have a free trial, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this item in full.
back to top icon