Key points
- Short tax returns did not include the high income child benefit charge.
- Discovery assessments made for 2015-16 and 2016-17 and a closure notice for 2017-18.
- The child benefit was paid to the wife of a soldier serving abroad.
- The reasonable excuse defence.
- Can ignorance of the law ever be an excuse?
- Was HMRC’s publicity of the high income child benefit charge effective?
- Why did the Cooke case not fall within HMRC’s previously announced review of failure to notify penalties relating to the child benefit charge?
I have some disquiet on reading the decision of the First-tier Tribunal in Graham Cooke (TC7819). I suspect largely because I do not understand how the case turned into a question of reasonable excuse when HMRC had apparently already indicated a willingness to address the issue in question. I suspect that Judge Rankin was equating reasonable excuse with failure to take reasonable care ...