Taxation logo taxation mission text

Since 1927 the leading authority on tax law, practice and administration

Implications of the Court of Appeal’s decision in Cobalt Data Centre 2 LLP and another

103693
Tarnished contract

Key points

  • From their inception in FA 1980 enterprise zone allowances (EZAs) presented the potential to claim enhanced capital allowances offering 100% relief for qualifying expenditure.
  • Two LLPs were formed (Cobalt Data Centre 2 and Cobalt Data Centre 3) and promoted to investors wishing to mitigate income tax.
  • HMRC denied the claims for EZAs on the basis the data centres were not constructed under the contract because it had been varied too much.
  • Enhanced allowances continue to be offered despite the risk that they might become the focus for exploitation or avoidance.
  • HMRC seems to be defeating more avoidance schemes in the higher courts.

The recent decision of the Court of Appeal in Cobalt Data Centre 2 LLP and Cobalt Data Centre 3 LLP v CRC perhaps does not make for the most engaging read for most tax advisers. However it did provide an interesting conclusion on contracts related...

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxation.co.uk, please click the login box below:

If you are not a subscriber but are a registered user or have a free trial, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this item in full.
back to top icon