Taxation logo taxation mission text

Since 1927 the leading authority on tax law, practice and administration
Home Saved articles Viewed items Login Contact Free Trial Advertise View virtual issue View online issue

This week's opinion: 24 February 2022

22 February 2022 / Andrew Hubbard
Issue: 4829 / Categories: Comment & Analysis
IR35 disputes – no easy solution

Employment status disputes are never far away. This week, we carry a report on the Adrian Chiles IR35 First-tier Tribunal decision (see page 6) and there have been two recent reports which had much to say on the topic (tinyurl.com/naoir35refrep – see page 5 – and tinyurl.com/bde7e6yy). 

This is, of course, nothing new. On my first visit to an Inland Revenue head office, nearly 40 years ago, I spoke to an inspector who had been tasked with creating a single page employment status questionnaire. It had to have an odd number of yes/no questions and taxpayers would have to answer each one. A simple majority would determine employment status. That, understandably, never saw the light of day and, although we now have the check employment status for tax (CEST) tool, I am not sure that we have really made much progress in the intervening decades. In the 1980s, personal service companies (PSCs) were a rarity except for highly-paid film stars, whereas they are now an additional – and real – complication. The problem has become a triangular one, with the three sides representing employment, self-employment, and PSCs. 

Triangular problems are notoriously hard to solve. The most famous of them, Fermat’s last theorem, took over 300 years to solve. I like to be optimistic, but I cannot help thinking that our own triangular problem will be almost as hard to resolve. It may not take 300 years, but I am sure that employment status will continue to be a regular topic of discussion in these pages long after I have passed the editorial pen to my successor – and I have no intention of doing that any time soon.

If you do one thing...

Read paragraphs 23 to 32 of the Hyman case for a concise summary of the limited reliance that the courts will accord to HMRC guidance (see tinyurl.com/ewcahyman).

Issue: 4829 / Categories: Comment & Analysis
back to top icon