I read with interest Richard Curtis' article 'Jump into a Jersey' (Taxation, 19 January 2006, page 389). Naturally enough, this focused on the tax implications of operating a bank account in Jersey, but in practice general law considerations can be far more important.
I have just got round to reading John's article on page 123 of Taxation, 3 November 2005. He says that BIM 45700 allows borrowing against revaluation reserve. In Example 3 it specifically says that it does not:

