Taxation logo taxation mission text

Since 1927 the leading authority on tax law, practice and administration

Second claim is abusive

28 October 2013
Issue: 4426 / Categories: Tax cases , Admin , Double taxation , Income Tax , Residence & domicile

M Macklin (TC2943)

The taxpayer was a UK resident who worked in the US for a bank from July 1976 to March 1998 when he retired and returned home to his home country.

He received a pension from the bank; the payments were foreign pension payments for UK tax purposes under ITEPA 2003 s 575. The taxpayer said they qualified for repayment of tax on the basis of the exemption in article 17(1)(b) of the UK/US double tax agreement. He submitted claims for 2003/04 to 2006/07.

HMRC disallowed the claims saying the payments were taxable in the UK subject to the 10% abatement in s 575 because the bank’s retirement plan was not established in the US.

The taxpayer made new claims in April 2009 for the same period without mentioning his previous attempts had been rejected.

The Revenue this time accepted the claims and made the repayment....

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxation.co.uk, please click the login box below:

If you are not a subscriber but are a registered user or have a free trial, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this item in full.
back to top icon