Taxation logo taxation mission text

Since 1927 the leading authority on tax law, practice and administration
Issue: Vol 169, Issue 4352

Issue: Vol 169, Issue 4352

3 May 2012
IN THIS ISSUE
What steps show an arrangement is caught by disguised remuneration rules? IAIN ROBERTSON explains
KEITH M GORDON asks a P35 service company question and gets a reply worthy of Captain Mainwaring

NICHOLA ROSS MARTIN ponders whether actors are itinerant workers

The first four sittings of the Public Bill Committee’s debates on the Finance (No 4) Bill are reported by ALLISON PLAGER
A property originally owned by a grandmother was left to the client’s father and his sisters and then to the client and his sister. The client’s aunts were allowed to live in the property for as long...
A, B and C are sisters and partners in an LLP investing in residential property. A lived in one of the properties for a year
The owner of a flat in the UK let this out before going to work abroad 25 years ago. Income has been declared correctly each tax year. The client intends to return to the UK and reoccupy the flat for...
A Portuguese company owns land in Portugal on which it has built a villa. Some time ago, the company’s domicile was changed to Malta for tax reasons, although UK corporation tax returns are submitted...
Selling debts; Corporate partner; Pension compensation; Virtual remuneration
'OTS must keep on top of small business issues'
'HMRC are shifting cost and responsibility to taxpayers and agents'
IHT, VAT, SDLT, International; NI; capital gains; Lloyds
Toolkits updated; VAT notes; ISA Bulletin 43; Skipton Fund; P35 deadline
Tax credits deadline is 31 July
'Taxpayers considering judicial review must act as a matter of urgency'
Show
15
Results
back to top icon